It’s interesting to me that they rely heavily on Hollywood and Fox Personalities (shocking-a network focuses on attractive female hosts). They are almost all posed photos. On the other hand, the Democratic women are candid shots and photo-shopped images. Candid shots often catch people in mid-speaking or mid-movement. Nobody takes a good picture that way. It’s why I hate “Stars Without Makeup” comparisons pics… anyone looks better when they pose for a picture. And photo-shopping womens’ heads on to Saddam Hussein’s body? That’s keeping it classy. I notice that they also mostly avoid Hollywood actresses for the Democrats. I wonder how that would look?
That’s just a small list. Afterall, 99% of Hollywood is liberal-right? I bet that easily 89% of Maxim’s Hot 100 list is liberal/Democrat.
And sorry, Palin and Bachman’s personalities and questionable intelligence makes them unappealing. Gretchen Carlson is to annoying and willing to play ultra-dumb for the Fox and Friends Audience. Laura Ingram is debatable. And why do Republicans insist on claiming Ann Coulter is desirable? And yet, I feel mean for pointing that stuff out. Why?
The problem here is? “Our Ladies Are Hotter” is disrespectful to both the “hot” women and the “ugly” women. It officially declares the only really important thing about a woman is how hot she is. Not her personality, knowledge or talent. Just her “hotness”. It’s more than a little pathetic.
Posted in: Politics